I'm reviewing a paper for the first time. One of the instructions is a tad dramatic for my liking :
7. If qualified historians wish to use your report, we will ask you or your heirs. If you wish us to destroy your report, then please inform us.
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean. Shorter, more focused posts specialising in astronomy and data visualisation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Weaponising dark matter
Stephen Baxter's Xeelee sequence revolves around a war between baryonic and non-baryonic life forms. One memorable sequence features a p...
-
Of course you can prove a negative. In one sense this can be the easiest thing in the world : your theory predicts something which doesn...
-
In the last batch of simulations, we dropped a long gas stream into the gravitational potential of a cluster to see if it would get torn...
-
Yesterday I removed from a certain community's spam folder a post consisting of 94 slides about some sterotypical pseudoscience theor...
Happy to let qualified historians use my report. My heirs belong to a little-known cult of irritable ninjas so any unqualified users will be summarily executed.
ReplyDeletePS: My standards for qualification are secret and proprietary.
Which journal is that?
ReplyDeleteI had a request to referee a paper last week, giving me the opportunity to tell the editor "I'm busy preparing to be hit by a Category 5 hurricane". They accepted this as a valid excuse!
ApJ. Be sure to name your heirs before the next hurricane hits... :P
ReplyDeleteInteresting. Same journal I just turned down…
ReplyDeleteThis is all your fault, Minchin ! :P
ReplyDelete