I'm reviewing a paper for the first time. One of the instructions is a tad dramatic for my liking :
7. If qualified historians wish to use your report, we will ask you or your heirs. If you wish us to destroy your report, then please inform us.
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean. Shorter, more focused posts specialising in astronomy and data visualisation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AI Can Help Us Publish Less, Says Scientist
Not really all that much about AI in this one , actually. I think everyone agrees that "publish or perish" is bad, but I don't...
-
It's time for another round of evaluating whether ChatGPT is actually helpful for astronomical research. My previous experiments can be ...
-
My excitement for ChatGPT-5 continues to defy the Will Of The Internet. Sod y'all, this is feckin' awesome ! This is the upgrade I...
-
The last time I tried to count the number of times objects had been claimed to be the first dark galaxy candidates, I stopped at ten becaus...
Happy to let qualified historians use my report. My heirs belong to a little-known cult of irritable ninjas so any unqualified users will be summarily executed.
ReplyDeletePS: My standards for qualification are secret and proprietary.
Which journal is that?
ReplyDeleteI had a request to referee a paper last week, giving me the opportunity to tell the editor "I'm busy preparing to be hit by a Category 5 hurricane". They accepted this as a valid excuse!
ApJ. Be sure to name your heirs before the next hurricane hits... :P
ReplyDeleteInteresting. Same journal I just turned down…
ReplyDeleteThis is all your fault, Minchin ! :P
ReplyDelete