Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean. Shorter, more focused posts specialising in astronomy and data visualisation.
Tuesday, 21 June 2016
Kaboom !
Couple more turbulent clouds. These ones are smaller than the last ones, same sort of turbulence but a bit more energetic in the one on the right. Since the resolution is higher than the previous sims, the small-scale turbulence doesn't decay so rapidly so they expand much more. One problem is that the simulation domain is rather limited so we can't tell exactly how large the structures end up. And though we can measure the velocity width, we can't yet measure the all-important signal to noise to tell us what we'd detect over time. That has to await the return of the resident FLASH expert.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AI Can Help Us Publish Less, Says Scientist
Not really all that much about AI in this one , actually. I think everyone agrees that "publish or perish" is bad, but I don't...
-
It's time for another round of evaluating whether ChatGPT is actually helpful for astronomical research. My previous experiments can be ...
-
My excitement for ChatGPT-5 continues to defy the Will Of The Internet. Sod y'all, this is feckin' awesome ! This is the upgrade I...
-
The last time I tried to count the number of times objects had been claimed to be the first dark galaxy candidates, I stopped at ten becaus...

That's a very nice simulation. I've been creating timelapse videos of cloud turbulence at 1 frame per second with an inexpensive smartphone. https://plus.google.com/108900938699941870401/posts/JGMsTNZFPBC
ReplyDelete