Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean. Shorter, more focused posts specialising in astronomy and data visualisation.
Tuesday, 21 June 2016
Kaboom !
Couple more turbulent clouds. These ones are smaller than the last ones, same sort of turbulence but a bit more energetic in the one on the right. Since the resolution is higher than the previous sims, the small-scale turbulence doesn't decay so rapidly so they expand much more. One problem is that the simulation domain is rather limited so we can't tell exactly how large the structures end up. And though we can measure the velocity width, we can't yet measure the all-important signal to noise to tell us what we'd detect over time. That has to await the return of the resident FLASH expert.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Making Shit Up
Today's paper is one that fits into a very rare category where I'm prepared to say : this should not have been accepted by the refe...
-
Of course you can prove a negative. In one sense this can be the easiest thing in the world : your theory predicts something which doesn...
-
It's time for another round of evaluating whether ChatGPT is actually helpful for astronomical research. My previous experiments can be ...
-
The last time I tried to count the number of times objects had been claimed to be the first dark galaxy candidates, I stopped at ten becaus...

That's a very nice simulation. I've been creating timelapse videos of cloud turbulence at 1 frame per second with an inexpensive smartphone. https://plus.google.com/108900938699941870401/posts/JGMsTNZFPBC
ReplyDelete