The other paper I read today on the train. This one's about an almost dark hydrogen cloud in the Virgo cluster, a.k.a. my personal obsession.
This particular cloud has been detected some time ago, but this new analysis adds more observations and simulations. It's got about 30 million solar masses of hydrogen and maybe as many as 100,000 solar masses of stars, although no-one is quite sure exactly. In any case, it's got way more gas than stars. Earlier papers hinted that it might be rotating, but very slowly. It's also very compact, perhaps only 1/30th the size of the Milky Way. And it's really far from any other galaxies, so it's not easy to see how the little blighter formed.
Although the thing is so bloody faint it's hard to be entirely sure, the authors found no evidence of an old stellar population : stars don't seem to have started forming until about 50 Myr ago. Which would make it an incredibly young galaxy, and that would fit quite well with its overall properties (mass, size, velocity dispersion). But an old stellar population would be hard to detect, so the limits on that seem to be pretty crappy really.
More secure are the author's measurements of the cloud's chemical composition. If this really was a young galaxy, it should be nearly pristine, primordial gas. But it isn't - it's got the composition of a far more massive galaxy. With this few stars, it's impossible to produce such a composition in the 50 Myr time frame. What this means, the author's say, is that it's far more likely this cloud was ripped out of a galaxy.
But, given the distance of the nearest galaxy this cloud could have originated in, this means the itty-bitty thing would have to survive a billion years of travel through the hot, oppressive intracluster gas. Can it ? Their simulations say yes, quite happily - the intracluster gas actually helps confine it and prevents it from flying apart. As you may have seen (https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RhysTaylorRhysy/posts/SbWeh4rJapA), we're running our own simulations of such an idea in Prague, with blackjack, and hookers... but we get a totally different result. The reason seems to be that the clouds we're interested in have a much greater velocity dispersion, so blast themselves apart in a great big splooch. The cloud in this paper doesn't have that problem : its thermal pressure can balance out nicely with the surrounding gas pressure, and it stays as a happy little gas cloud for a billion years or more.
All well and good, but of course the mystery isn't solved yet. As the authors note, it's difficult to explain why the cloud should have gone along quietly minding its own business for a billion years and then VERY SUDDENLY DECIDED IT WANTED TO FORM STARS for some reason. It's not near any galaxies today, so tidal encounters can't explain it. While clouds like this one have been produced in lots of different studies, they're always part of a much larger star-forming "wake" of stripped material. In this case, that material is completely absent. Where's it gone ? Why did this lonely little guy survive, all alone on the wide wide sea ?
No-one knows. But if the bloomin' Arecibo Time Allocation Committee would just bloomin' well realise the value of big surveys, we could detect a whole bunch more of these critters and maybe start to figure something out.
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/doi/10.1093/mnras/sty467
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Of course you can prove a negative. In one sense this can be the easiest thing in the world : your theory predicts something which doesn...
-
Why Philosophy Matters for Science : A Worked Example "Fox News host Chris Wallace pushed Republican presidential candidate to expand...
-
In the last batch of simulations, we dropped a long gas stream into the gravitational potential of a cluster to see if it would get torn...
ReplyDelete" quietly minding its own business for a billion years"
... so I'm reading along in the paper at
arxiv.org - arxiv.org/pdf/1802.05625.pdf
And got to that bit in Section 6:
"It is clear that such a high (and extremely homogeneous) metallicity cannot arise from chemical evolution within a stellar system of such low mass. The stripping of some pre-enriched gas from, e.g., the disc of a spiral galaxy appears as the most likely origin for the system, as it would fit both the high metallicity and the (possible) lack of an old stellar population."
So my question is, if all these brand new O stars are appearing, when would SECCO 1 have purloined all those metallic gases? Could that stripping have set some star formation in motion?
The idea here is that the gas cloud was stripped from a galaxy which has already been cycling gas into stars and back into gas for billions of years. So it begins its lonely wanderings through the ICM already enriched in metals. Much later, for no apparent reason, it suddenly decides to start forming stars. Those will also enrich the gas with metals, but by a comparatively negligible amount because there just isn't enough time.
ReplyDeleteThe act of stripping itself could certainly have triggered some star formation. But this isn't necessary to increase the metal content, because gas within galaxies has already been cycled through several generations of stars so it's got plenty of metals already. The main problem is that billion year gap between when stripping started and the current episode of star formation. However, the freefall time (for gravitational collapse) of such clouds is highly sensitive to their initial radius - it could be as much as 1 Gyr if they were just a little bit bigger initially (I know because I already did this calculation for very similar clouds - http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.3001T section 3.2.1). So maybe we just happen to be witnessing the cloud at that particular moment.
I'd be surprised if the cloud turned out not to have any old stellar population at all. But the really weird thing for me is where the rest of the stripped material has gone - simulations produce clouds like this by gas stripping in different ways, but only as part of very extended structures. They haven't yet demonstrated any way to either rip out a compact cloud without a much larger gas feature, or produce some particular feature which is much denser and/or brighter than the rest.