Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean. Shorter, more focused posts specialising in astronomy and data visualisation.

Saturday, 20 January 2018

The scientific method gone badly wrong


Pretty much. Needs stuff about popularity and highly funded grants.

I need scarcely remind readers that I do not think this indicates anything whatsoever about how common this is in practise.
at
Labels:

3 comments:

  1. Dan Weese20 January 2018 at 11:26

    Also something about p-values.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Shaun Griffith20 January 2018 at 12:39

    And grant proposals to study the effectiveness of different grant proposal workflows.

    ReplyDelete
  3. James Garry21 January 2018 at 00:37

    I particularly like how there are no loops back once you hit the ''computer model' stage.

    "Sure our model's probably wrong and has a ton of bugs! Let's get that poster cranked out and then think about a paper!"

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

ChatGPT Is A Competent Source Extractor

This builds on my post from two years ago, ChatGPT Is Not A Source Extractor . My, how things change. Last time I wrote : They're still ...

  • Proving a negative is perfectly possible
    Of course you can prove a negative. In one sense this can be the easiest thing in the world : your theory predicts something which doesn...
  • The Secret History of Dark Matter
    One of the nice things about doing all my academic reading on a digital tablet is that I can download papers I'd like to read purely fo...
  • Taking galaxies off life support
    Very long-term readers may remember my anguished efforts  (almost a decade ago) to build a stable disc galaxy. Sweet summer child that I was...