If someone else doesn't have this already, which they almost certainly do, I'm totally claiming this as Rhys' Law :
The value of a press release and the probability that the reported discovery is correct is anti-correlated with the grandiosity of the claims.
It's probably not a linear relation. Maybe more like a galactic hydrogen density profile : flat near the middle out to some quite large distance (importance of the claim), but then it drops precipitously beyond the stellar disc (as claims move from "probably" and "show" to "mystery solved" and "proof").
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean. Shorter, more focused posts specialising in astronomy and data visualisation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Giants in the deep
Here's a fun little paper about hunting the gassiest galaxies in the Universe. I have to admit that FAST is delivering some very impres...
-
Of course you can prove a negative. In one sense this can be the easiest thing in the world : your theory predicts something which doesn...
-
Why Philosophy Matters for Science : A Worked Example "Fox News host Chris Wallace pushed Republican presidential candidate to expand...
-
In the last batch of simulations, we dropped a long gas stream into the gravitational potential of a cluster to see if it would get torn...
... unless the headline reads "Astro-boffins say...."
ReplyDeleteI think "scientists say they've solved mystery X" is only marginally more credible than a press release announcing that mystery X is solved. So "scientists say" statements would just be a bit closer to the middle.
ReplyDeleteaka "the next HUGE thing to make us look as smart publishers addressing smart readers"
ReplyDelete"a new study says"...
ReplyDeleteIncredible how useful this is. I've just came across "new study shows Einstein's Theory of General Relativity was wrong". Some people published a paper that claims speed of light was infinite near the Big Bang. Great news.
ReplyDeleteI think I'm going to have to graph this up xkcd-style when time permits.
ReplyDeleteDogmatic Pyrrhonist Ahh, yes, there may be a fundamental plane where truthiness can be judged by the grandiosity of the claim itself on one axis and the language used on another...
A thought occurs that maybe this should be grandiosity of the statement as a whole, i.e. drama of claim multiplied by decisiveness of language.
ReplyDeleteSorry. It's a corollary of Simon's Law of Preview , which states:
ReplyDeleteThe longer and more grandiose the preview, the worse the film.