I'm sort of tempted to start an e-petition to compel them to actually use the name. Yes, the government couldn't directly force them to choose the name, but I'll bet the science minister has some influential clout.
Why I think they should actually use the name instead of dismissing it as the internet having a laugh :
- By having the audacity to use such a silly name for such a serious project, it will project supreme self confidence to the world.
- It will instantly appeal to a huge number of young taxpayers who would otherwise not have cared.
- It's a conversation starter. The name buys you a massive outreach opportunity that a polar explorer or a naturalist just doesn't.
- It will instantly and forever shatter the image of the elitist, out of touch, boring scientist. I can't emphasise enough how important that is. Also this : http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2016/04/16/ask-ethan-why-dont-you-look-like-a-scientist/#61aedb12272c
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-36064659
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean. Shorter, more focused posts specialising in astronomy and data visualisation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AI Can Help Us Publish Less, Says Scientist
Not really all that much about AI in this one , actually. I think everyone agrees that "publish or perish" is bad, but I don't...
-
It's time for another round of evaluating whether ChatGPT is actually helpful for astronomical research. My previous experiments can be ...
-
My excitement for ChatGPT-5 continues to defy the Will Of The Internet. Sod y'all, this is feckin' awesome ! This is the upgrade I...
-
The last time I tried to count the number of times objects had been claimed to be the first dark galaxy candidates, I stopped at ten becaus...
Completely agree on all fronts.
ReplyDeleteOr another compromise? David McBoatface.
ReplyDelete